[#4]
Upon reading chapter 2 from Carolyn Porter’s, William Faulkner, she describes the first opening pages of Light in August as a “world in motion […] a moving present capable of leading us virtually anywhere” (87). In the first chapter of LIA we learn about Lena Grove and her quest to find the father of her unborn father.
Lena is a character that represents this motion of “moving present” and she goes about doing so in such a dream-like manner. All of her actions seem slow paced, as if she’s in no particular rush. We know very little about her past and what Faulkner does expose is very bleak and dull. In fact, Lena’s past is quite simple so it would make sense that her story would be centered around the present.
Behind her the four weeks, the evocation of far is a peaceful corridor paved with unflagging and tranquil faith and peopled with kind and nameless faces and voices: […] bankrolling now behind her a long monotonous succession of peaceful and undeviating changes from day to dark and dark to day again, through which she advanced in identical and anonymous and deliberate wagons… (LIA, 7)
Lena however is a small piece of an even larger story. LIA allows us to shift between the past and the present simultaneously through the narratives of Joe Christmas, Hightower, Byron Bunch, etc. and then have them all culminate at the end. Each of these characters are alien to the town and the narrative also shifts to the view of the town itself. It functions as a community rejecting outsiders such as Lena, Joe Christmas, and Hightower. Carolyn Porter expands on this idea in more eloquent way, “As time moves on and plots multiply and crosshatch with each other, the novel sets itself an enormous task of assimilation; as the structure expands to encompass a lengthening history within an ordered whole, that order is continually revealing itself as inadequate to larger demands for meaning posed by the continuously moving present.” (91). That’s a lot to unpack, but essentially what Porter is trying to say is that memory/ histories are centered around time, and the novel seems to offer a story in which past and present move parallel to one another and then converge at the middle only to be explained side by side again. Faulkner manipulates memory and creates a novel that could possibly be read as a myth or fairy-tale, or maybe even a fable as the novel seeks to explore the need for redemption.
As LIA began with Lena, it ends with her as well. “Lena’s story acts not only as bracket but also as ellipsis; it encloses and relieves the tragedy of Joe Christmas, but it also extends and amplifies its intensity.” (Porter, 92). The structure of the novel very much functions like memory itself. It is in fact a “moving present.” Faulkner takes the concept of time and memory and frames them to make them appear as if they are always moving forward, even if it is a memory itself because the past is always working towards the ever moving present. In simplest terms, its the need to move forward despite where we’ve come from. The idea to move forward is indicative of the human condition. Is this not what Gail Hightower tried to achieve? The need to atone and redeem ourselves; to find a meaning and a purpose. This is what Lena offers us at the end of the novel, the need to redeem or start over. The opportunity to change what we’ve perceived to be true. Lena forces us to challenge the norm by venturing out of our comfort zone.

