extra readings up + study questions

As promised, I’ve posted a couple of extra readings on dropbox.  The first is two brief introductions to TSAF that Faulkner wrote subsequent to the novel’s publication; the second is a useful (though completely optional) essay that Malcolm Cowley wrote to THE PORTABLE FAULKNER volume that helped introduce Faulkner to a broader audience in the 1940s, when most of his novels were out of print.

You’ll also notice a new item in the blog header, “study questions.”  That’s where I’ll post questions to guide your reading, time and sanity permitting.  I’ve posted questions for the “Benjy” section just now, so take a look and see you Tuesday.

Faulkner’s drawings

This just in from a former student: a thoughtful reflection on a series of drawings Faulkner did for a campus publication at the U of MS in the 1920s.  It would be an interesting research project to trace Faulkner’s relationship to the “Jazz Age” through these drawings and other of his early work, such as the novel MOSQUITOES.  And for the curious, you can see the book that compiles the drawings and other early work here.

blog post assignment

As you can see in the syllabus, you are responsible for making regular posts to this blog.  I do this in lieu of the kind of “response papers” many of my colleagues assign (and until recently I did to).  Why?

1. Blogging is sharable: rather than have a private circuit between you and me, we have a much more dynamic conversation across the entire class (and here, between MA and BA students that don’t meet in real time).

2. Blogging in public, sort of: I like the idea that we are responsible for our ideas in front of broader audiences.  In practical terms, I doubt anyone is listening in most of the time, but I think it’s important that we roll up our sleeves and defend our arguments in an open and public forum as often as possible.  And of course, you can show your family/friends/pets what we’ve been up to in class.

3. Blogging is sturdy: rather than forget the piece of paper once it’s been handed back, we can link back to prior statements or observations, or to each others.

4. Blogging is responsive: rather than only getting comments from me, you’ll comment on and get comments on each other’s work.

 

So what are you responsible for doing for Tuesday?  I want something short and pithy, about 400-800 words.  I want it to engage some part of the text (here, the “Benjy” section of TSAF).  I want it to have quotations and what we English types call “close reading”: careful attention not just to what is said, but how it is constructed.  This latter issue is easy with Faulkner, since nearly everything he wrote is quite dense and poetic and practically begs for this treatment.

Also, don’t be afraid to express confusion, doubt, frustration, and the like, so long as you do so via close encounters with the text that’s confounding you.  Rather than just throw up your hands and say “I don’t get it,” say “here’s what I don’t quite get” and/or “I’m not sure, but I think the text is saying X and Y” or “I’m not clear on how Z is working, but I find the following aspects of it interesting in some way.”

Below you’ll find an example of a good response with my comments in the margins.  It’s a real response from a real student, and I use it anonymously with permission.

[scribd id=164210402 key=key-16chtmjefp6sdsb1zh35 mode=scroll]

So use this as a model of sorts, and I look forward to seeing what you’ve posted by *Tuesday, Sept 3* at classtime (for BAs: 9/10 for MA students).

list of readings

Welcome to ENGL 389.51 + ENGL 784, “William Faulkner.” Just wanted to introduce myself and to give you a heads-up re: what we’ll be doing in a few weeks when the course begins.

Here’s the list of novels we’ll be reading, in the order we’ll be reading them:

THE SOUND AND THE FURY
AS I LAY DYING
LIGHT IN AUGUST
ABSALOM, ABSALOM!
GO DOWN, MOSES

You can see all the details on the syllabus page, including the schedule and rough sketch of assignments. All books are at Shakes and Co., across the street from campus; make sure to get the “corrected edition” put out by Vintage if you shop for your own copies.

All best and see you pretty soon.