Blogging 101

A central feature of this course will be the writing we do on this site. In what follows, I will outline three things:

  • a rationale for why I ask you to blog in the first place, rather than write traditional essays
  • a quick primer on how to create your first post
  • a simple rubric to guide your writing + an example of a good-looking post

First things first: why blog?

1. Blogging is sharable: rather than have a private circuit between you and me, we have a much more dynamic conversation across the entire class.

2. Blogging is public, sort of: I like the idea that we are responsible for our ideas in front of broader audiences. In practical terms, I doubt anyone is listening in most of the time, but I think it’s important that we roll up our sleeves and defend our arguments in an open and public forum as often as possible. And of course, you can show your family/friends/pets what we’ve been up to in class. For those who have reservations about privacy, note that a) you can only be identified via firstname+last initial, so you have relative privacy beyond our class; and b) you are free to delete your posts at the end of class. If anyone has serious reservations despite all this, feel free to contact me. A fuller accounting of rights/responsibilities is here.

3. Blogging is sturdy: rather than forget the piece of paper once it’s been handed back, we can link back to prior statements or observations, or to each others’. If you like, you can leave your posts up for future students to see.

4. Blogging is responsive: rather than only getting comments from me, you’ll comment on and get comments on each other’s work.

So how do you post? Here’s a quick guide to posting on WordPress for newbies. It’s super easy once you figure it out the first time. So here goes:

1. LOG ON: anyone can see the blog site, but only those logged on as “authors” can post. If you simply click on the link you received when I invited you, you can follow the prompts to log in. Two helpful hints:

a) you can always tell when you’re logged in, since there’s a slim black bar across the top that looks like this:

Screenshot 2015-02-06 14.06.48

and b), if you ever want to go straight to the “back end” of the site (called the “dashboard” in WP parlance), throw “admin” on the end of the URL. So, jallred.net/wordpress/faulkner takes you to the site, whereas jallred.net/wordpress/faulkner/admin takes you to the login dialogue and then to the “dashboard.” Try it.

2. START A POST: there are several ways to post. Here’s the easiest: click the <+ NEW> icon in the top middle of the screen and select “post.” It looks like this:

Screenshot 2016-01-27 22.00.33

3. WRITE SOMETHING: “New Post” will take you to a basic text editor. So write something. If you want to get fancy, you can add italics, bold, indentation, insert images or other media, and whatnot. But most of the time you’ll just try to write some reasonable sentences. When you’re done, click PUBLISH on the right (see image below). Or, if you’re not quite ready, you can save it as a draft and reopen it later, via the “POSTS” section of the dashboard. Helpful hint: WordPress autosaves your work every few seconds, so it’s very, very rare to lose stuff. Nonetheless it’s not a bad idea to compose posts on a word processor and then paste them into WP just in case. I personally live dangerously most of the time and have never lost anything, but your call.

We’re good, right? Happy blogging.

What makes for an excellent post? For this class, posts should:

  • contain 400-800 words (use word count in WordPress or your word processor)
  • analyze a text’s form and themes, using quotations and paraphrases of the text with page numbers in parentheses
  • engage the text critically, pointing out the particular ways it imagines, for example, racial or gender identities, relates to other texts we’ve read, harbors unstated assumptions, etc.

Here’s a simple rubric, adapted from Mark Sample, that I will use to evaluate your work (see how the academic blogosphere encourages sharing and exchange? I told you so!):

Rating Characteristics
4 Exceptional. The post is focused and coherently integrates examples with explanations or analysis. It moves beyond summary to engage the text critically,  giving a sharp, original close reading. It makes useful connections to other texts and raises novel questions. It points out aspects of the text that will surprise and stimulate the casual reader: “why didn’t I think of that?!”
3 Satisfactory. The post is reasonably focused, and explanations or analysis are mostly based on examples or other evidence. It provides a dutiful reading of primary text but fails to engage the text more than glancingly. The entry reflects moderate engagement with the topic and/or rehashes what was said in class.
2 Underdeveloped. The post is restricted to summary, without consideration of alternative perspectives, and may contain misreadings of the text at one or more points. The entry reflects passing engagement with the topic.
1 Limited. The journal entry is unfocused, or simply rehashes others’ comments; it fails to grasp fundamental aspects of the argument.
0 No Credit. The journal entry is missing or consists of one or two disconnected sentences.

Last but not least, here’s an example of a good-looking post. We won’t read The Unvanquished this time, so the particulars won’t be familiar. But note how the author:

  • draws a tight focus on something “a bit weird” at the top: most casual readers won’t have focused on the way sleep is thematized in the text.
  • uses quotations from different points in the text to show how the theme is threaded throughout the text.
  • balances quotation/paraphrase and original analysis so we feel ourselves carries along by an argument, not just a grab-bag of moments.

Your results may vary, and that’s fine. I just wanted you to see what I consider strong work before you launch into it yourselves.

summary post on Yoknapedia entries

I wanted to give a quick sense of how we’re doing collectively with the encyclopedia entries. Generally I’m very pleased, but there are a few persistent issues, and a few things I’d like to remind you about. So here goes:

  • make sure the entry hasn’t been done already! a couple students have duplicated entries, so be sure to check before you write to make sure the coast is clear.
  • analyze, don’t summarize: as we move beyond the “short” length, it’s important to avoid summary of characters and plot. Treat this space like any other literary critical outlet in this sense: assume the audience knows the basics and spend your energies on developing aspects of the text that would not be clear to the casual reader.
  • link and illustrate when possible: link to as many other entries as are appropriate, and feel free to find open-access images to illustrate your entry. Good sources include wikipedia (which has many creative commons-licensed images) and Flickr (again, check licenses before posting).
  • tag: most of you are adding tags, but at a minimum be sure to add short/medium/long and the title of the text with the proper shorthand (TSAF/LIA/AA!/and so on). U is traditional for THE UNVANQUISHED, but I think we should write that one out, since “U” in tagging brings up every single word with U in it, which is a pain to deal with.
  • follow formatting guidelines: I’ve given extensive guidelines on the GUIDE TO ENTRIES page, so please follow them so we have a uniform format. Katie’s entry on Jimson Weed is a great example: well formatted and inclusion of nice image as well.

All of the entries are good, but I wanted to call attention to a few that are especially thought-provoking and serve as good examples of writing at the “medium” entry length. Check out Cara’s Luster, Kristy’s Great Locomotive Chase, and Stephen’s Ringo, among others.

Have a great weekend and see you Thursday.

General thoughts on Post #1

I’ve just finished responding to all the posts I received for the first week and must say, I’m very pleased. Everyone is reading well–no mean feat especially for the 60% of you who have never read any of Faulkner’s novels–and many of you are doing excellent analysis. The hill that a significant number of students need to climb is moving from impressions to arguments. By this I mean a writing voice that moves through a progression of argumentative claims that take readers from point A to point Z in increasing complexity. The impressionistic voice, in contrast, records one’s reading experience–how hard the text is, how one feels about the characters, what kinds of affects the text conjured up. These impressions are all valuable, of course, but they are grist for the critical mill, not the final product. The best analyses show what the structure of the text does to inspire the impressions and feelings that one experiences in the course of reading.

More substantively, I was interested to read the various takes you had on the novel’s startling clash between a consistent overarching theme–roughly, Caddy’s violations of sexual taboos as registered through very different subjectivities–and wildly divergent literary forms. Several of you noted that Benjy records reality like an audio or video recorder: see Molly’s response for a vivid example. This is an argument that critics like Peter Lurie have developed at great length.

I also note that many of you wrestled with Quentin’s narrative’s juxtaposition of what the early 2othC philosopher Bergson called temps with duree: the objective, measurable “clock time” that we moderns all attend to and the subjective “inner” sense o time as duration, as something liquid and changeable. See Katie’s post for a lovely reading of this dynamic.

Finally, a number of you explored links between Faulkner and other examples of literary modernism, such as Joyce or Woolf. This is something we’ll talk about throughout the course. For now, check out Matthew’s comparison between Benjy’s narrative and that of Molly Bloom in Ulysses.

We’ve got our work cut out for us Thursday due to the snow day: show up ready to sweat it out (literally) and work through as much of the novel as possible. We’ll also learn how to create an entry in the wiki (due a week from Thursday). Also, don’t forget you’ve got Post #2 due Thursday.

What we’ve read

I thought you might like to see where we are as a class prior to working together this term. As you know, I surveyed you. Here are the results:

So a lot of virgins, which is great, and a full 60% who have read nothing or perhaps a short story or two. As you think about entering Faulkner’s county, especially if for the first time, you might check out this wonderful post and learn how to pronounce Yoknapatawpha from its creator.

Questions up on AILD and LIA/library session

I’ve finally caught up on posting study questions: I’ve backfilled on AILD for what it’s worth and provided some food for thought as we start LIA as well.

Also, remember that the BAs are meeting in the library on Friday (tomorrow): E609 (on the sixth floor: ask a librarian if you get lost).  Come prepared to start working on at least one medium-length entry, and perhaps the long entry that is our “term paper,” more or less.

Yoknapedia tip

I think several students have composed entries in Word (or whatever word processor) and then attached the files to the wiki site.  Instead, you should compose in the word processor, then start a new entry on the wiki and *paste* the text from the word processor into the window.  Then it will be visible immediately to readers rather than making them click and download.

 

 

Zotero: best research tool ever

First of all, auditors can disregard for the most part.  Second, you should have received an email inviting you to join Zotero, a fascinating interface that allows you to gather cites, organize them, insert them into your essays with the proper MLA (or whatever) formatting, etc.  In this way, it’s much like EndNote or Mendeley or RefWorks or other flavors of bibliographic software.  You can either access it exclusively via your web browser or (and I recommend this second option) download Zotero “standalone,” which is a nice little app that runs on your computer, so you can store and manage the material on your computer/s and have Zotero automatically back them up and sync (if you use more than one computer) via its server.
But it’s got a social dimension built in, and this functionality (along with its being free, open-source, and designed by academics for scholarly, nonprofit use) sets it apart.  So once you join the “Faulkner” folder I’ve set up (instructions should be in the aforementioned email), you can access scores of cites I’ve already gathered to help you with your research.  You can also (once you get the hang of it) add to this folder, so that we all benefit from each person’s research.
I’ll help out with this in more detail later on (and for the BAs, we’ll examine it during the library session, when we have one terminal/student). But I wanted to let you get started, especially as you tackle your first Yoknapedia entries.

Sundquist supplementary reading

I’ve added several critical articles to the AILD subfolder within our shared Dropbox folder.  For BAs, all these are optional, depending on your time and interest.  For MAs, I’d like you to read the Sundquist essay for next time; the others are purely optional.  For those interested in the representations of rural space and poor whites in the novel, the Lester article might be especially interesting.

WordPress tip: gravatars

It’s very easy to create a “gravatar” (Globally Recognized Avatar) for yourself that represents you pictorially when you post or comment on wordpress (or many other places).  Go to the gravatar site and then take a picture using your computer’s camera, choose an existing picture, or choose any avatar image you like to represent yourself.  Extra bonus: it makes it easier for me and for peers to put a face to the comment, especially in the early part of the term when we’re still learning names.